Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts
Friday, April 23, 2010
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Mad as Hell
I thought I was mad as hell a few weeks ago. That was after reading about the $200 Billion the Fed was going to offer to Hedge Funds or anyone else willing to take the money and buy consumer debt with it while the Fed automatically was willing to take a 10% "haircut" on the deal assuming it would be lost up front. There were many reasons why this pissed me off.
Now I am madder! Reading an article in the Wall Street Journal today made me so mad I am not even finished reading it yet and I had to write this post.
I just got finished reading an article on Bloomberg about the incompetent SEC and their blatant and pointed failure to investigate short sellers or otherwise enforce any of the rules on the books with respect to short selling for years. It appears anyone with half a brain in the industry will tell you the shorts drove Bear and Lehman out of business. I mean this game has been going on for over a century. The fines that were levied were by the NYSE or the AMEX and who got the largest fine since July 2006 from the NYSE? None other than J.P. Morgan Securities. This is all old school BS from the Blue Blood firms on Wall Street who have been putting their competitors out of business when the opportunity arises for over a century.
Yea, that article did not piss me off so much because I have been writing for years how incompetent the SEC is / was / and will be for to long to be surprised or pissed off by anything those num-nuts did or did not do.
But this WSJ article... That is a different story.
So we have this Geithner protégé of Paulson and his infinite wisdom of continuing the print money and bail out Wall Street mentality he was trained into talking about is brilliant scheme to pump over $1 Trillion of cash into the hands of hedge funds or whoever is willing to then buy debt with it. Yea, OK, so it is bad enough that the Treasury / Fed / Guaranteed debt program has practically BEEN the debt markets for going on 6 months now but now we are going to expand it for another 6-9 months only through the avenue of the unregulated markets.
Yea, that is what I said. We are asking the pigs in the unregulated markets to bail out the "shadow banking system" i.e.; the business model that you borrow money from the "markets" and lend it to consumers to buy shit when you are not a bank and are not regulated like the banking industry.
Side note: I remember back in 1989, during the last real estate / banking / S&L / junk debt market bubble imploded and my mother was taking money from investors and buying foreclosures with it and flipping them and she got a letter from the MD State Banking regulator inquiring whether she was acting as a bank, taking deposits and paying a rate of return. This was basically harassment instigated by a local bank that obviously was not pleased by the competition she may or may have not posed to the property developer owners of the bank. Needless to say, since then it seems any organization could raise money from just about anywhere and lend it out so long as they did not open "retail" branches.
OK, so the Obama Administration's stance on pay for the participants:
Of course not. These people are hurting. I mean I just got finished reading about Greenwich's "Rodeo Drive" and the impact of these hedge fund folks declining income levels. God forbid we subject an unregulated industry to some kind of cap on how much of the cash they can strip from the government handout. I mean, the government is already willing to take a 10% loss. Now if I were a smart hedge fund manager, I would be willing to jump in and buy assets now only if I thought 1) they have fallen so far there is little to no risk buying them and 2) with a 10% write-off by the government up front, I know I can take my cut because I can easily beat the pathetic odds a desperate bunch of rookies in Washington are willing to give away to play this game.
This is a good one:
Let me rephrase this for you. The Administration officials are hoping the public is just stupid enough to allow them to take taxpayer money and give it to a bunch of unregulated pigs who are directly responsible for much of the malign in the financial markets right now and differentiate between those pigs and the other ones that Paulson bailed out last fall when he gave AIG $80 Billion that promptly went into the accounts of his former firm who was made whole on the worthless paper they held from AIG while managing to make a fortune shorting the stock and on AIG CDS's bought from third parties. Goldman knew the contracts AIG sold them would bankrupt AIG as there was no way in hell any company could cough up the kind of collateral needed to cover the contracts AIG sold for pennies on the dollar that covered billions in debt.
Read this:
Why the F*** are they bothering with the private industry at all? Because the government is trying desperately to figure out how to make their buddies "whole" again. I mean, when the dot com crash hit shortly after dragging some long established companies in the toilet with them (along with the telecom industry, the Enrons' etc.) what a better way to dole out big fat government checks then to have a war?
Well the peace-nic administration is up to its eyeballs in war, debt, bankruptcies and the like. So how in the hell are they going to keep the artificial free market economy with it's consolidated global financial industry (not to mention almost total consolidation of every other GD industry in the US) afloat? Print money! Yea. And don't forget, include the unregulated financial markets, and don't forget, take the vast majority of the risk for further write downs or financial collapse, and don't forget, we are all partners here:-) Smiles for everyone. Back to Greenwich and "Rodeo Drive".
Oh don't forget:
Yea, ingenious.
Lastly I am absolutely dumfounded pissed at the insistence of calling the s*** the banks bought over the past few years "assets".
God Damnit, the stuff is worthless paper. Get over it. It is gone, lost, worthless. Write the S*** off and if you go under so be it. There are plenty of folks out of a job from the financial sector who are perfectly capable of opening a fricken retail bank to serve the rest of us lowly servant citizens...
Now I am madder! Reading an article in the Wall Street Journal today made me so mad I am not even finished reading it yet and I had to write this post.
I just got finished reading an article on Bloomberg about the incompetent SEC and their blatant and pointed failure to investigate short sellers or otherwise enforce any of the rules on the books with respect to short selling for years. It appears anyone with half a brain in the industry will tell you the shorts drove Bear and Lehman out of business. I mean this game has been going on for over a century. The fines that were levied were by the NYSE or the AMEX and who got the largest fine since July 2006 from the NYSE? None other than J.P. Morgan Securities. This is all old school BS from the Blue Blood firms on Wall Street who have been putting their competitors out of business when the opportunity arises for over a century.
Yea, that article did not piss me off so much because I have been writing for years how incompetent the SEC is / was / and will be for to long to be surprised or pissed off by anything those num-nuts did or did not do.
But this WSJ article... That is a different story.
So we have this Geithner protégé of Paulson and his infinite wisdom of continuing the print money and bail out Wall Street mentality he was trained into talking about is brilliant scheme to pump over $1 Trillion of cash into the hands of hedge funds or whoever is willing to then buy debt with it. Yea, OK, so it is bad enough that the Treasury / Fed / Guaranteed debt program has practically BEEN the debt markets for going on 6 months now but now we are going to expand it for another 6-9 months only through the avenue of the unregulated markets.
Yea, that is what I said. We are asking the pigs in the unregulated markets to bail out the "shadow banking system" i.e.; the business model that you borrow money from the "markets" and lend it to consumers to buy shit when you are not a bank and are not regulated like the banking industry.
Side note: I remember back in 1989, during the last real estate / banking / S&L / junk debt market bubble imploded and my mother was taking money from investors and buying foreclosures with it and flipping them and she got a letter from the MD State Banking regulator inquiring whether she was acting as a bank, taking deposits and paying a rate of return. This was basically harassment instigated by a local bank that obviously was not pleased by the competition she may or may have not posed to the property developer owners of the bank. Needless to say, since then it seems any organization could raise money from just about anywhere and lend it out so long as they did not open "retail" branches.
OK, so the Obama Administration's stance on pay for the participants:
To encourage investor participation, the Treasury believes participants in the program shouldn't be subject to executive-pay rules imposed by Congress. The law authorizing the $700 billion bailout and a provision in the $787 billion stimulus package impose tough pay restrictions on firms that receive government funds, including limits on bonuses.
Of course not. These people are hurting. I mean I just got finished reading about Greenwich's "Rodeo Drive" and the impact of these hedge fund folks declining income levels. God forbid we subject an unregulated industry to some kind of cap on how much of the cash they can strip from the government handout. I mean, the government is already willing to take a 10% loss. Now if I were a smart hedge fund manager, I would be willing to jump in and buy assets now only if I thought 1) they have fallen so far there is little to no risk buying them and 2) with a 10% write-off by the government up front, I know I can take my cut because I can easily beat the pathetic odds a desperate bunch of rookies in Washington are willing to give away to play this game.
This is a good one:
Administration officials are hoping the public will draw a distinction between financial firms that receive a government rescue, such as AIG, and those such as hedge funds and private-equity firms that participate as investors in broad government programs.
Let me rephrase this for you. The Administration officials are hoping the public is just stupid enough to allow them to take taxpayer money and give it to a bunch of unregulated pigs who are directly responsible for much of the malign in the financial markets right now and differentiate between those pigs and the other ones that Paulson bailed out last fall when he gave AIG $80 Billion that promptly went into the accounts of his former firm who was made whole on the worthless paper they held from AIG while managing to make a fortune shorting the stock and on AIG CDS's bought from third parties. Goldman knew the contracts AIG sold them would bankrupt AIG as there was no way in hell any company could cough up the kind of collateral needed to cover the contracts AIG sold for pennies on the dollar that covered billions in debt.
Read this:
Targeting mortgages that banks no longer want to hold, the Treasury and the FDIC will provide financing to buyers. The FDIC will auction off pools of loans that a bank wants to sell and will become a co-owner by forming a partnership with the highest bidder.
The partnership will then raise FDIC-guaranteed debt to finance a portion of the purchase price, with the Treasury willing to kick in between 50% and 80% of the equity needed to buy the assets. The Treasury will be an equal investor in the partnerships.
Why the F*** are they bothering with the private industry at all? Because the government is trying desperately to figure out how to make their buddies "whole" again. I mean, when the dot com crash hit shortly after dragging some long established companies in the toilet with them (along with the telecom industry, the Enrons' etc.) what a better way to dole out big fat government checks then to have a war?
Well the peace-nic administration is up to its eyeballs in war, debt, bankruptcies and the like. So how in the hell are they going to keep the artificial free market economy with it's consolidated global financial industry (not to mention almost total consolidation of every other GD industry in the US) afloat? Print money! Yea. And don't forget, include the unregulated financial markets, and don't forget, take the vast majority of the risk for further write downs or financial collapse, and don't forget, we are all partners here:-) Smiles for everyone. Back to Greenwich and "Rodeo Drive".
Oh don't forget:
Lastly, the government will expand the Fed's Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, to help absorb risky assets dating back several years.
Yea, ingenious.
Lastly I am absolutely dumfounded pissed at the insistence of calling the s*** the banks bought over the past few years "assets".
In an op-ed piece in Monday's Wall Street Journal, Mr. Geithner wrote that the efforts will help tackle the glut of assets clogging bank balance sheets and will help provide some kind of normal price for these assets, which the Treasury believes are currently undervalued.
God Damnit, the stuff is worthless paper. Get over it. It is gone, lost, worthless. Write the S*** off and if you go under so be it. There are plenty of folks out of a job from the financial sector who are perfectly capable of opening a fricken retail bank to serve the rest of us lowly servant citizens...
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Thank you Bernie
Driving and listening to NPR this evening I heard two guests talking about the Bernie Madoff guilty plea. One guest had, at best, a trailer park knowledge of the workings of the investment world and continuously refered to "her sources" an could do no more than focus on the few million dollars Bernie and his wife managed to squirrel away in her name. Listening to this woman was worse than listening to a bunch of impotent Senators talk about Wall Street bonuses. The more I listen to the "news" and "news shows" with supposed "knowledgeable" reporters and other industry appointed "experts" the more incensed I get with the ignorance being blatantly displayed about the world of international finance and the workings of unregulated funds.
Every time I hear "the SEC 'investigated' Madoff's business" and gave him a clean bill of health my eyes roll. Since when in the last 20 years did the SEC do a damn thing? Anyone who has known me for a while will remember my outrage when Eliot Spitser had to do their job for them for 5 years and the how pissed off I was when he came to DC to sit in front of our spineless, impotent government while being sneered at by the SEC for making them look like the complete fools there were.
So the media saying "the SEC did nothing to stop Bernie Madoff" is like saying its hard to light a match when it is raining. Duh. The SEC did nothing for 20 years.
Then I hear people suggesting the SEC is responsible for them loosing money with Madoff. Well this is just as comical. Madoff operated his "fund" like a "hedge fund" and from what I know, they are not regulated. The SEC only looked into his clearing operations, not his "fund". They apparently had him register as an advisor, but about that time, the SEC had started a program requiring certain Hedge Funds to register with the SEC. However, the Hedge Fund industry sued and had that requirement overturned. So if (and I don't know if this is the case in Madoff's fund) Madoff was required to register under the then "new" SEC requirement, he could have withdrawn his registration like many Hedge Funds did after the overturning of the rule in court.
So what is the moral of this story and why am I thanking Bernie? It is because as far as I am concerned, Bernie may have done more harm to the reputations of unregistered pools of cash burning every asset class on the planet then any impotent SEC or government body possibly could have. And, until unregulated pools of capital and their wrath of unregulated insurance products and the like are completely removed from the global financial system, we are going to have serious problems.
Thank you Bernie. You are scum. But the Banks, Wall Street firms, Insurance companies, and other "financial firms" that have been allowed to become "regulated banks" who have all taken taxpayer money and cannot or will not explain where it went are all the same right now. They take taxpayer money, put in a pool of cash and pay out others with it. What is the Fricken difference?
All the pigs became ridiculously over leveraged and lost the capacity to segregate any aspects of their Enron structured, far fledged, business. All of them have done everything possible, including stealing from their clients funds, instituting ridicules arbitrary fees, charging for services that were supposed to be free or included in certain types of accounts, raising interest rates or any other scheme they could think of to stay afloat.
I have personally witnessed each of these in my bank, investment and credit cards in the past 9 months. Just ask me and I will give you an example of each one listed above.
Every time I hear "the SEC 'investigated' Madoff's business" and gave him a clean bill of health my eyes roll. Since when in the last 20 years did the SEC do a damn thing? Anyone who has known me for a while will remember my outrage when Eliot Spitser had to do their job for them for 5 years and the how pissed off I was when he came to DC to sit in front of our spineless, impotent government while being sneered at by the SEC for making them look like the complete fools there were.
So the media saying "the SEC did nothing to stop Bernie Madoff" is like saying its hard to light a match when it is raining. Duh. The SEC did nothing for 20 years.
Then I hear people suggesting the SEC is responsible for them loosing money with Madoff. Well this is just as comical. Madoff operated his "fund" like a "hedge fund" and from what I know, they are not regulated. The SEC only looked into his clearing operations, not his "fund". They apparently had him register as an advisor, but about that time, the SEC had started a program requiring certain Hedge Funds to register with the SEC. However, the Hedge Fund industry sued and had that requirement overturned. So if (and I don't know if this is the case in Madoff's fund) Madoff was required to register under the then "new" SEC requirement, he could have withdrawn his registration like many Hedge Funds did after the overturning of the rule in court.
So what is the moral of this story and why am I thanking Bernie? It is because as far as I am concerned, Bernie may have done more harm to the reputations of unregistered pools of cash burning every asset class on the planet then any impotent SEC or government body possibly could have. And, until unregulated pools of capital and their wrath of unregulated insurance products and the like are completely removed from the global financial system, we are going to have serious problems.
Thank you Bernie. You are scum. But the Banks, Wall Street firms, Insurance companies, and other "financial firms" that have been allowed to become "regulated banks" who have all taken taxpayer money and cannot or will not explain where it went are all the same right now. They take taxpayer money, put in a pool of cash and pay out others with it. What is the Fricken difference?
All the pigs became ridiculously over leveraged and lost the capacity to segregate any aspects of their Enron structured, far fledged, business. All of them have done everything possible, including stealing from their clients funds, instituting ridicules arbitrary fees, charging for services that were supposed to be free or included in certain types of accounts, raising interest rates or any other scheme they could think of to stay afloat.
I have personally witnessed each of these in my bank, investment and credit cards in the past 9 months. Just ask me and I will give you an example of each one listed above.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)